Tim Jones (center), executive director of the Richmond Housing Authority, looks over a housing report with Jackie Thompson, president of the Friendship Manor residents council, before the Richmond City Council meeting Oct. 17, 2013. Friendship Manor is one five public housing complexes owned by the housing authority.
RICHMOND, Calif. – The problems at the Richmond Housing Authority aren’t new – and neither are the plans to fix it.
In 2005, Richmond had serious financial and management problems. It was in debt, paperwork was in disarray, and staff were untrained and ineffective, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. HUD devised a detailed plan to overhaul the agency.
But the problems continued. Since 2009, the housing authority has landed on HUD’s troubled list for not taking care of its finances or reining in its debt.
HUD auditors said one of the reasons Richmond kept sliding backward was because it hid the dysfunction from city and HUD officials. They particularly targeted Executive Director Tim Jones for withholding information and not responding to emails.
“There was an extreme lack of cooperation by Richmond Housing Authority management staff,” according to a 2012 HUD memo. “Documents requested were either not provided, wrong documents provided, or the RHA staff appeared to purposely delay providing documents.”
Now that HUD has threatened to take over the housing authority, Richmond officials have begun to make changes.
HUD’s current plan for improving Richmond is almost identical to the one it handed Richmond when it faced similar problems in 2005: Get its finances under control. Get a handle on the debt. Improve its contracting system. Keep the books in order.
In 2012, the city seized control of the housing authority’s finances. Federal officials say Richmond so far has met its improvement deadlines.
“Going forward, there are good things happening at the housing authority,” said Bill Lindsay, the city manager.
The housing authority is trying to wipe out its $7 million debt – nine years after it first became a problem.
It’s in the process of selling off a $40 million, 400-unit apartment complex that it bought a decade ago. It was supposed to be a long-term source of money for the housing authority, bringing in $164,000 in 2013. Now, its sale is being used as a one-time payout to repay the debt and $2.2 million in federal fines for past contracting mistakes.
The agency says it has a solution to get out of its public housing crisis: Convert most of its public housing to private management under the Section 8 voucher program. By 2016, the housing authority plans to spend $65 million in public and private financing to modernize four of its five housing projects and privatize them.
However, Richmond’s worst housing project is the one complex that’s not part of the rehab.
Instead, housing authority officials have talked about eventually selling or demolishing the building. Hacienda, which has 150 units for mainly elderly and disabled residents, has been the biggest source of problems for the housing authority. Many residents live in squalor from pest infestations, mold and roof leaks.
It’s unclear what would happen to them if the building were demolished. In the meantime, the housing authority has been spraying the complex to combat its infestation problems and is looking for a contractor to fix its roof.
Richmond’s Section 8 program hasn’t been a model for success, either. It also was labeled one of the worst in the country for major mismanagement and disorganization, according to federal audits.
Any agency that scores below 60 percent is labeled troubled. Richmond received a 13 percent rating in 2011 and has been on the Section 8 troubled list almost every year since 2008, according to federal data. It got off the troubled list in 2012, with a score of 74.
The housing authority doesn’t deal with property management in the Section 8 program, but it was failing in basic bookkeeping.
It was not ensuring that life-threatening health and safety violations in residents’ apartments were corrected within 24 hours, was not properly selecting people off the waiting list and had been miscalculating how much tenants owed in rent each month, according to federal audits.
For their part, residents aren’t optimistic about things changing in Richmond anytime soon.
“We’re out here suffering,” said 73-year-old Geneva Eaton, a longtime Hacienda tenant. “The housing authority doesn’t care. And they won’t fix it.”
This story was edited by Andrew Donohue. It was copy edited by Nikki Frick and Christine Lee.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.