Authorities in Arkansas responded to an open-government request with richly detailed spreadsheets listing the state’s homeland security grant purchases by community, number of equipment items, brand name, price and more. The individual Excel files are available for download below. Use the tabs contained in each one to see expenditures by grant year and program. Here are some of the things you’ll find by doing so: The city of Little Rock spent $13,000 on two Segway scooters, Fulton County purchased seven pairs of binoculars for $500 each and Benton County bought six night-vision devices costing $3,200 a piece. Hope, Ark., became a symbol of the federal government’s ineptitude in the catastrophic wake of Hurricane Katrina. Months after the storm struck land, more than 12,000 manufactured homes built as shelter for evacuees sat empty there on an airport tarmac. The Department of Homeland Security, it turned out, had spent $850 million purchasing the structures, on top of the hefty expense required to maintain them long term. During April of 2006, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee convened a special hearing in Hope and demanded to know what went wrong. Inspector General Richard Skinner, an independent overseer of the department, told policymakers at the meeting that FEMA’s ill-conceived disaster response resulted in far more units being bought than needed and that millions of additional dollars were wasted after clearing locations for the homes that turned out to be unsuitable due to contamination and other reasons. Making matters worse, Skinner said, the actual style of units purchased couldn’t be deployed in flood plains, meaning much of Louisiana and Mississippi. Some of the structures were damaged by contractors during delivery, and others began warping after being stored improperly. “The federal government, in particular FEMA, has received widespread criticism for a slow and ineffective response [to the 2005 hurricane season],” Skinner testified. “Unfortunately, as my testimony today articulates, much of the criticism is warranted.” The temporary housing mess after Katrina continued to be a problem years later, and Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas sponsored a bill in 2009 aimed at forcing FEMA to address the surplus. According to Pryor’s office, the agency continues to pay $125 million annually just to keep in place 120,000 manufactured houses, many of which are newer units purchased since Katrina for possible future disaster victims beyond what already existed. But the federal government estimated in June of 2008 that the overwhelming majority of them were actually unusable, either because they could not be equipped for habitation quickly enough, dangerously high formaldehyde levels existed in the units or substantial decay had set in. The FEMA Accountability Act proposed by Pryor would require that the agency sell, transfer or dispose of what it doesn’t plan to keep. Otherwise, our review of available audit documents covering anti-terrorism grant spending in Arkansas didn’t reveal significant findings in terms of how the funds were managed by state officials. But reviewing purchases using the files uploaded here still enables readers to see just what types of investments were made by their community. Are they reasonable and seem to suit the emergency-preparedness needs of your area? Have a look for yourself.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.