- Mental health evaluations for armed-guard applicants. Oklahoma flags applicants who are considered mentally unstable and may need treatment before receiving a license. In 2008, Oklahoma regulators intervened in the case of one guard, already licensed, who had attempted suicide and appeared to be on the edge of a mental break. He lost his license. In addition, the state monitors substance abuse problems. In another case, an Oklahoma guard overdosed on a painkiller and muscle relaxer while on duty. Regulators eventually persuaded the guard to voluntarily surrender his license.
- Tracking and investigating security guard shootings. Florida does the most thorough job of tracking, responding to and investigating security guard shootings. Regulators there routinely collect news reports of shootings and have at times recommended more training in place of license suspension or revocation. In some cases, the state’s Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services immediately suspended guards involved in particularly problematic shootings. In cases involving criminal activity, the agency has the option of forwarding cases to certified law enforcement investigators for eventual arrest and prosecution. In most other states, though, armed guards continue working after a shooting.
- Firearms training. New York requires the most firearms training of any state, including a full day of training on use of force and 40 hours on the range. In 1975, a federal task force called for guards to receive at least 24 hours of firearms training; today, only 10 states meet this guideline.
- Federal background checks. In California, an armed guard is required to obtain a special firearms permit, allowing the state to conduct a specific type of federal background check to determine whether the guard is prohibited from possessing a gun. Under current federal law, this type of check is allowed only if the state issues a firearms license. But many states issue “armed guard” licenses. A simple change in semantics would allow those states to conduct similar checks – filtering out individuals who have been involuntarily committed, are subject to restraining orders or are no longer allowed to possess or carry guns for other reasons.
What’s not working
- Little to no firearms training. In some states, a guard can get a license or permit to carry a gun after testing that’s tantamount to target practice. Some guards don’t have to go through any training at all. The low training standards and the implicit risks posed by guns have prompted some in the industry, including regulators, to avoid hiring armed guards. “Personally, my company doesn’t do any armed work. None of the clients I have want armed officers,” said Glade Johnson, a security company owner who serves as chairman of Georgia’s Board of Private Detective and Security Agencies. “When they ask for them, my first question is always, ‘Who do you want us to shoot?’ And they say, ‘Nobody.’ So let’s not put guns on them.”
- What are armed guards learning? One of the earliest studies of the private security industry found that even military veterans were not sufficiently equipped to work as armed guards. Experts told Reveal that a guard must know when to use a gun, not just how. “I can train a monkey to shoot a gun. But I can’t train him when,” said William Blake, a security consultant who worked for years in the banking industry. Still, few states require a specific course of study, such as when and how to use force.
- No background checks. Many states do not require criminal background checks or license armed guards who are prohibited by federal and state law from possessing guns. The problem is not primarily with the industry; many large security companies want background checks to avoid the liability of hiring errant security guards. The problem lies with federal legislators and individual states that refuse to facilitate access to criminal history information.
- Licensing armed guards who misuse their guns. Most regulators have no idea when a guard has fired his or her gun, causing injury or death. Twelve states have laws requiring regulators to collect reports of security guard shootings. But guards or their companies, beholden to the honor system, are responsible for sending in the reports. As a result, regulators don’t learn about many shootings and, in many cases, do nothing with the reports they receive.
This story was edited by Robert Salladay and Amy Pyle and copy edited by Sheela Kamath and Nikki Frick.