Authorities in Tennessee are admitting it was a mistake to label a public letter from the American Civil Liberties Union as “suspicious” in a map that tracks terrorism and criminal information. The letter encouraged area public-school administrators to recognize that numerous religions celebrate the holiday season, not just Christianity.
The ACLU’s Tennessee chapter learned Tuesday that a local police-run intelligence fusion center responsible for collecting and analyzing information about possible terrorist threats had classified the letter under “terrorism events and other suspicious activity.” Leaders of the civil liberties group – which has campaigned against excessive government surveillance for decades, at times becoming a target of police spying itself – reacted angrily, calling the designation “outrageous.”
A senior police official said personnel simply intended to circulate a news story about the letter, but the ACLU still wants to know why communications with the public that deal with education policy and not public safety are being monitored by a fusion center. Dozens of the centers sprang up after Sept. 11 for local, state and federal law enforcement to exchange data and terrorism tips. Washington has poured more than $426 million into supporting fusion centers since 2004.
From a statement by the ACLU chapter’s executive director, Hedy Weinberg:
It is deeply disturbing that Tennessee’s fusion center is tracking First Amendment-protected activity. … Religious freedom is a founding principle in our Constitution – not fodder for overzealous law enforcement.
Tennessee’s counterterrorism initiatives recently made a high-profile appearance in “Monitoring America,” the latest installment in an ongoing series of investigative stories from the Washington Post examining the massive and costly new intelligence architecture created after Sept. 11 to prevent terrorism attacks.
Reporters Dana Priest and William Arkin found that Memphis had launched a “data revolution” for intelligence purposes, sucking up customer names and addresses from a local utility company, storing away details from incoming emergency 911 calls and mining uploaded crime reports for the phone numbers of victims, suspects and witnesses. According to the story:
The [federal Department of Homeland Security] helped Memphis buy surveillance cameras that monitor residents near high-crime housing projects, problematic street corners, and bridges and other critical infrastructure. It helped pay for license-plate readers and defrayed some of the cost of setting up Memphis’s crime-analysis center. All together it has given Memphis $11 million since 2003 in homeland security grants, most of which the city has used to fight crime.
A local newspaper piled on last weekend reporting that more than three decades ago the Memphis Police Department had agreed to a ban on political surveillance following a 1976 lawsuit that accused law enforcement of unfairly spying on war demonstrators and civil-rights activists. The department at that time reportedly burned six filing cabinets filled with spy files. But the prohibition on political-intelligence gathering had not been fully incorporated into department policies and procedures until this week after the Memphis Commercial Appeal story surfaced.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.