Reporters are discovering one unique way to examine spending from President Obama’s stimulus package: comparing it to the disarray that surrounded homeland security grants after Sept. 11. With a little help from the Center for Investigative Reporting, the Voice of San Diego produced this story on May 20. We’ve also covered California’s grant spending in the past.
In the wake of Sept. 11, 2001, the federal government flooded California with money to help the state ramp up its homeland security effort. San Diego benefited greatly from the spending, reaping more than $20 million in homeland security grants since 2002.
But while San Diego and other local governments spent the federal money, the state scrambled to keep track of where all the cash was going. As California’s spending on homeland security ballooned from a few million in 2000 to more than $500 million in 2003, the state’s effort to account for all the money became akin to “trying to build a bicycle while you’re riding it,” according to one senior state official.
It took the state more than five years to get around to checking on San Diego’s spending of the federal grants, according to state and county audits. Those documents reveal that for the first few years the federal money poured into San Diego, few formal procedures existed to track whether the money was actually being spent on the purpose for which Congress made it available: Making San Diegans safer.
When the federal government did its own checking, it found that, as a result of the state of California’s poor monitoring of the homeland security money, local governments had been allowed to misspend millions of dollars. California was also unable to adequately measure whether the vast amounts of money actually helped to protect the state’s citizens, a federal audit concluded.
Now, the federal government plans to send California more than $80 billion—an amount that makes the state’s homeland security spending look puny—via the stimulus package. The city of San Diego hopes to claim more than $56 million of that money, and the county and other local cities, schools, and agencies hope to pick up tens of millions more.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, firstname.lastname@example.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, email@example.com.
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us email@example.com or email Sarah Mirk, firstname.lastname@example.org.
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
Voice of San Diego probes recovery spending with help from CIR
G.W. Schulz is a reporter for Reveal, covering security, privacy, technology and criminal justice. Since joining The Center for Investigative Reporting in 2008, he's reported stories for NPR, KQED, Wired.com, The Dallas Morning News, the Chicago Tribune, the San Francisco Chronicle, Mother Jones and more. Prior to that, he wrote for the San Francisco Bay Guardian and was an early contributor to The Chauncey Bailey Project, which won a Tom Renner Award from Investigative Reporters and Editors in 2008. Schulz also has won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association and the Society of Professional Journalists’ Northern California Chapter. He graduated from the University of Kansas and is based in Austin, Texas.