A helicopter pilot for a medical transport company refused to fly over mountainous terrain because his emergency locator device wasn’t working. Government investigators helped him prove that he was fired for blowing the whistle on his company. The Ohio-based pilot, whose name was not released publicly, got his job back at Air Methods Corp. and more than $165,000 in back wages and damages.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration hailed the case as a success.

“Whistleblower protections are critical to keeping workplaces safe,” according to a statement issued earlier this month by Nick Walters, the federal agency’s regional administrator in Chicago. “Disciplining an employee for following safety procedures is illegal and puts everyone at risk.”

If only it were that simple. The pilot is among a small group of successful whistleblowers, according to a trove of data recently released by the agency, covering everyone from railroad workers to food processing employees.

The takeaway? In the decade wrapping up in 2014, only 439 out of more than 23,000 whistleblower complaints were found to have merit. That means only 2 percent of whistleblowers win their cases. Seniors on NCAA football teams face similar odds of being drafted by the NFL.

To be fair, though, 22 percent of cases were settled in some manner. And it’s clear that David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for OSHA, counts those as victories as well. He referred to payouts to workers under both merit and settlement cases in a speech to his agency’s Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee in September.

Combined, the settled and merit cases put about $25 million into workers’ pockets in 2013, almost double the $13.25 million awarded to workers in 2009.

Michaels also described plans to help workers even more by lowering the bar they have to clear to prove their case. The change would mean that workers would need to establish “reasonable cause” that a violation occurred, rather than a “preponderance of evidence.” The new standard was in play in the pilot’s case, in which OSHA determined that there was cause to believe a violation took place.

In an even more recent whistleblower case, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with air marshal Robert MacLean for exposing that air marshals were being pulled off planes due to budget cuts amid an imminent terrorist threat in 2003.

MacLean’s victory hinged on the difference between a regulation and a law, a seemingly minor technicality that can make or break a whistleblower’s case. That case went through a whistleblower law especially for federal employees – one that’s not under OSHA’s purview.

Exactly what the latest change for OSHA cases looks like for other workers remains unclear. But the statement about lowering the bar for workers set the legal and human resources worlds ablaze with predictions of a “flood of frivolous claims.”


Frivolous or not, the flood appears to have started before the policy change. More people are stepping forward to report workplace misconduct. In 2008, the number of complaints filed surpassed 2,000 for the first time and last year peaked at 3,060.

Over that time, the odds of striking the “merit” finding jackpot have not really improved. And the cases that OSHA investigates, of course, don’t count the types of whistleblowers who take their grievances straight to the courthouse, to another government agency or to the media. Edward Snowden – the most notable whistleblower of late, who insists that exile in Russia is just fine – can hardly be considered part of the triumphant 2 percent.

This story was edited by Fernando Diaz and copy edited by Nikki Frick.

Christina Jewett can be reached at cjewett@revealnews.org. Follow her on Twitter: @JewettCIR.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Christina Jewett

Christina Jewett is a reporter for Reveal, covering labor and workplace issues with a focus on the workers' compensation system. With reporting partner Will Evans and CNN, she exposed widespread fraud and failed government oversight of California’s network of addiction treatment centers for the poor. The stories led to the defunding of more than 200 rehab clinics and changes in state law. The Emmy-nominated series won the 2013 broadcast award from Investigative Reporters and Editors. Jewett – as part of California Watch, a project of The Center for Investigative Reporting – won the 2011 George Polk Award for medical reporting with Lance Williams and Stephen K. Doig. The series exposed outsized rates of rare but lucrative medical conditions at a rapidly growing hospital chain and spurred a federal investigation. She was also a Livingston Award finalist in 2010. Previously, Jewett worked at ProPublica and The Sacramento Bee, where a story she broke about contracting malfeasance led to arrests and convictions. She and a colleague also chronicled jail abuse and medical mistreatment, spurring countywide policy reforms. Those stories were honored with awards from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Jewett is based in Sacramento, California.