It may sound arcane, but it’s a raging battle of the new economy: whether workers should be classified as “independent contractors” instead of regular employees.
It makes a big difference. Independent contractors don’t get employee benefits and protections such as minimum wage, overtime pay, family and medical leave, unemployment insurance or workers’ compensation coverage.
That’s why many Uber and Lyft drivers and other “gig economy” workers are fighting for employee status.
Uber recently settled class-action lawsuits from drivers in California and Massachusetts, though the issue wasn’t settled at all. The company agreed to pay as much as $100 million – amounting to about $8,000 for an individual driver – but Uber won by keeping drivers as independent contractors.
Uber says that’s what most drivers want, too.
“Drivers value their independence – the freedom to push a button rather than punch a clock,” the company said in a statement. “That’s why we are so pleased that this settlement recognizes that drivers should remain as independent contractors, not employees.”
Lyft is in a similar spot. Uber’s competitor agreed to a $12 million settlement with drivers that also wouldn’t address their desire to be employees instead of independent contractors. A judge recently rejected the Lyft settlement as shortchanging the drivers.
California lawmakers waded into the “war of independence,” but then backed out. Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez introduced a bill in March that would give groups of independent contractors the right to organize and bargain contracts like unions do. Business groups came out strongly against it. Gonzalez pulled the bill last week but vowed to keep pushing the issue.
I achieved my goal of forcing a conversation on gig economy… This bill will continue outside the confines of these legislative deadlines.
— Lorena Gonzalez (@LorenaSGonzalez) April 21, 2016
The feds are on it, too. The National Labor Relations Board is arguing that misclassification is a labor law violation because it deprives workers of organizing rights, reports Politico’s Morning Shift, a source of daily labor news.
Taxpayers can lose out when workers are misclassified as independent contractors, because employers don’t withhold payroll taxes. A McClatchy and ProPublica investigation found that in the construction industry alone, misclassification leads to billions of dollars in lost tax revenues each year.
Some gig economy companies, such as Munchery, are reversing course, making their workers actual employees. And a pair of former Obama administration officials are arguing for a new category of independent worker, which would qualify for some benefits, such as the right to organize, but not others, such as overtime and minimum wage.
Either way, this fight is not going away any time soon.
Will Evans can be reached at wevans@cironline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @willCIR.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.