The Chicago Reporter’s latest investigation reveals that despite high profile settlements like the $5 million awarded to the family of Laquan McDonald, Chicago settled more than half of police misconduct lawsuits between 2012 to 2015 for $36,000 or less.
According to the Reporter’s analysis of 655 police misconduct lawsuits, Chicago spent more than $210 million on these lawsuits during that period. The settlements are searchable in the news organization’s database, Settling for Misconduct.
Because the city borrows to pay these settlements, the interest increases their cost to taxpayers.
The stories behind the lawsuits include a grandmother arrested for battery, a little girl who had a gun placed at her temple and a young man who was shocked with a Taser.
The Reporter also delves deep into the night that a dozen police officers stormed the home of Alfonso and Patricia Cavada, who had just birthed the couple’s youngest son a month earlier and was recovering from a cesarean section.
The officers were looking for one of Patricia’s sons, who was not there. The couple was arrested and forced to leave two young children with relatives. The city ultimately settled with the Cavadas for $40,000 and legal fees.
Among the Reporter’s findings:
- In the small fraction of cases where officers and the city admit liability, the officers rarely are disciplined.
- Nearly half of the lawsuits claim that officers filed false reports – and sometimes committed perjury on the witness stand – to cover up their misconduct.
- More than one-quarter of lawsuits allege that two or more officers conspired to violate a person’s civil rights. Nearly one-third allege that some officers on the scene could have but didn’t intervene to prevent misconduct.
- In one-quarter of excessive force lawsuits, the person who alleged police abuse was charged with either resisting arrest or assault of a police officer.
- One in 10 cases involves minors. Officers have been accused of pointing guns at children, shooting at teenagers and leaving toddlers alone while their parents were arrested.
- Roughly 1 in 6 cases alleges that an incident is part of a pattern of misconduct, fortified by specific Police Department policies or the city’s general failure to adequately investigate officer misconduct. The city usually successfully argues to dismiss these claims, or to separate them from particular claims about the incident. That means the cases are rarely adjudicated.
Fernando Diaz can be reached at fdiaz@cironline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @thefuturewasnow.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.