Our latest investigation started with this simple stat: Before Title IX, 90 percent of collegiate women’s sports were coached by women. Almost immediately after Title IX went into effect, that number plummeted.
We wanted to know what was behind this decline, and why it shows no signs of budging.
It turns out, after Congress passed the landmark gender equity law in the 1970s, schools merged men’s and women’s athletics directors. They put men in charge. And those men hired other men.
We then wanted to get a sense of what is happening today. Men continue to run most athletics departments (90 percent of them). And men continue to get a majority of the coaching jobs in women’s sports (65 percent of the more than 2,000 new jobs created between 2000 and 2014).
We went to the University of Iowa to tell the story because it provided a contemporary look at many of the factors that coaches say were at play at most schools back when Title IX first passed.
Here’s what we found:
* Female coaches across the country say they continue to be retaliated against for speaking up about discrimination.
In the past decade, at least 29 female coaches and eight female sports administrators have filed retaliation lawsuits against their universities. These lawsuits follow a similar storyline. A woman witnesses some discrimination in the athletic department. She speaks up to a superior. Then she gets fired or receives a negative performance evaluation.
* Coaches who speak up say they often are accused of abusing their players.
Almost half of the coaches in these retaliation cases – 13 in all – claim they were accused of mistreating or verbally abusing their players. They see themselves as whistleblowers who complain to the administration on behalf of the women’s teams. Then, they get hit with abuse allegations, either as the primary reason for their firing or as the university’s defense during the lawsuit.
* The University of Iowa, once a safe haven for female coaches, has joined the rest of the pack when it comes to gender equity.
The Hawkeyes originally bucked the trend in the 1970s, when they, unlike nearly every other college, left a woman in charge of women’s sports. Iowa eventually did put a man in charge, and in the last decade, it has seen the percentage of women coaching women’s sports drop, seen men get paid more to replace women, and seen a successful head coach who was an outspoken advocate for equity get fired.
* Iowa paid new male coaches more than new female coaches.
When he replaced two female coaches with men, the athletic director paid those men 25 percent more than their female predecessors. For the three he replaced with other women, he paid those women 13 percent less, according to public salary data.
Check out how well your school is doing with gender equity in coaching here:
You can read the full story here and listen to our Reveal episode with this story and others on gender equity in sports. You can subscribe to our podcast on iTunes or Stitcher.
[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/262832244″ params=”auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true” width=”100%” height=”450″ iframe=”true” /]
Andrew Donohue can be reached at adonohue@cironline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @add.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.