U.S. Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware has become the fifth Democratic lawmaker to demand the Trump administration scrap its plan to waive a 50-year-old anticorruption law that prevents officials who administer the GI Bill from accepting money from for-profit schools backed by taxpayer subsidies.
In a letter sent Friday to Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin, Carper called the administration’s plan “legally dubious.” Carper is a 23-year veteran of the Navy and Naval Reserves and the ranking Democrat on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The letter came in response to a proposed regulation, published in the Federal Register on Sept. 14, that would allow VA employees to receive wages, salary, dividends, profits, gratuities and services from for-profit schools that receive GI Bill funds. VA employees also would be allowed to hold an ownership interest in such schools.
The move, Carper wrote, represents “a drastic departure from the intent of Congress and weakens important ethics standards designed to protect VA employees and veterans.” He noted that it flies in the face of a request from the Senate Appropriations Committee in July, which recommended that the legal prohibitions in the anticorruption statute be strengthened, not weakened.
The proposed change was exposed by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, which repeatedly has documented abuses by for-profit colleges that seek to cash in on veterans’ GI Bill education benefits. The New York Times highlighted it as well.
Carper’s letter follows a similar missive sent Wednesday by Democratic Sens. Patty Murray of Washington, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Richard Durbin of Illinois.
The VA so far has resisted pressure to reverse course. On Friday, VA press secretary Curt Cashour told Reveal that “the department could lose thousands of employees” if prohibitions against payments by for-profit colleges were vigorously enforced and that “our ability to serve veterans would be seriously impeded.”
He downplayed the importance of the change, arguing that despite the blanket waiver, other conflict-of-interest laws still would apply. For example, materials attached to the proposed rule stipulate that VA employees would be required to “recuse themselves from VA matters when an employee’s participation would cause a reasonable person to question the employee’s impartiality.”
But critics say the rule change effectively would nullify critical consumer protections. They say it could create a situation in which VA officials, who are charged with ensuring GI Bill funds are well spent, could accept payments from colleges that are facing civil suits or probes from enforcement.
The rule is set to take effect Monday. “There has been no change in implementation plans,” Cashour said.
Aaron Glantz can be reached at aglantz@revealnews.org. Follow him on Twitter: @Aaron_Glantz.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.