A month ago, we sniffed out California’s largest known residential water user. Because a 1997 provision in the state’s Public Records Act protects homeowners’ utility data, we couldn’t attach an actual name to this mysterious “Wet Prince of Bel Air.” But here’s what we do know: He (or she) went through 11.8 million gallons in a year – enough for 90 families.
Responses to our story were swift. The Los Angeles Times’ Steve Lopez drove around Bel Air, peeking past hedges and interviewing residents. He later enlisted a “drought posse” to scour satellite maps, monitor water flows and fly drones over the neighborhood’s palatial homes.
“(H)ere’s a news flash for the barbarous beast,” he wrote. “We’re going to get you sooner or later, so why not make this easy on yourself? Drop the hose, drain the fountains and step out of the shadows.”
Two days later, the Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously to take action against the city’s biggest guzzlers. The motion required the city’s Department of Water and Power to explore imposing “severe financial penalties” on those who fail to conserve. The department is expected to report back to the council this month.
Other media organizations caught wind of the story, too: The New York Daily News, Breitbart and Mother Jones ran their own stories. Jezebel, the Gawker-owned women’s news blog, was perhaps the least charitable.
In one of two editorials, The Sacramento Bee called on California lawmakers to roll back the provision protecting the identities of water guzzlers.
“(T)here should be no exemption to the Public Records Act because a person might be embarrassed,” the editors wrote. “If attention shames extreme water wasters in curtailing use, the public would benefit.”
And last week, the San Francisco Chronicle revealed that the Menlo Country Club, which includes a lush golf course, used an astonishing 320,842 gallons per day in September – enough to supply 7,825 typical homes in the area.
Since we hung the Wet Prince out to dry, California water agencies have been compelled to act in response to news organizations’ public records requests. On Oct. 16, the East Bay Municipal Utility District released a list of residents slapped with fines for pumping more than 1,000 gallons of water. Among them was Billy Beane, the Oakland Athletics executive whose analytics-obsessed style was immortalized in the book – and film – “Moneyball.” And the Chronicle’s Menlo Country Club story came about after San Francisco’s Public Utilities Commission agreed to release data on users it had ordered to decrease water usage.
But our main question still lingers: Will the Wet Prince’s identity be made public anytime soon? It’s unlikely, unless California decides to change the law that conceals names of its biggest guzzlers. In other words, although the heat is on – from media, residents and local lawmakers – so is the water.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.