A controversial effort in rural Oregon to boost public safety services has failed. For the fifth time in a row.
Since 2012, residents of Josephine County repeatedly have rejected a tax increase that would help fund their bare-bones sheriff’s office. The 1,600-square-mile county, which has made national headlines for its staunch antigovernment posture, enjoys one of the lowest property tax rates in Oregon: about 59 cents per $1,000 in assessed property value.
This year’s proposed levy, an increase to $1.42, was voted down Tuesday by a wide margin. It would have paid for “enhanced law enforcement purposes” – more patrol deputies, improved probation services and additional resources for juvenile justice. The tax also would have added beds to the Josephine County jail, which critics have dubbed a revolving door that allows criminals to re-enter the community without consequences.
One such criminal, Brian Killian, has been charged with committing a double slaying last year just months after being released for lack of sufficient jail funding. He goes to trial this spring.
Without the levy, local law enforcement officials are scrambling for a new source of revenue for next year.
“Worst-case scenario, we close everything,” said Josephine County Sheriff Dave Daniel. “I can maybe sustain for another year” with the money currently available, he added. “That’s a maybe.”
Despite voters’ continued insistence on lowering taxes, Josephine County for years has been a beneficiary of government subsidies. Beginning in the 1990s, a drop in timber revenue put the county and dozens of others across the country in fiscal trouble. In response, the federal government passed the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act in 2000, which initiated a system of payments for areas affected by timber’s decline.
When these payments stalled in 2012, Josephine County’s law enforcement services were cut back dramatically. Officials released dozens of inmates from the jail; criminal investigations by Oregon State Police in the county shot up 600 percent in one month; and between 2012 and 2016, crimes reported in the county increased an average of 50 percent every year.
To make matters worse, the federal act now has expired, and experts fear there’s little hope of reauthorizing it, despite a bipartisan plea from Senate lawmakers last April.
“The short story is that counties will be missing payments this year,” Mark Haggerty, a policy analyst at Headwaters Economics, wrote in an email. “Conversations about what to do next are up in the air after last night.”
Josh Balloch, Josephine County’s lead organizer in favor of the tax increase, said the burden of fixing the community’s crime problem now should fall on the shoulders of residents who voted no.
“Those people now have a responsibility to come up with a solution,” he said. “This is real. This is not a game. There are people who are continuing to get hurt.”
Byard Duncan can be reached at bduncan@cironline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @ByardDuncan.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.