Federal safety officials fined Tesla Inc. more than $110,000, the biggest safety fine in the company’s history, after an employee received a high-voltage electrical shock at a solar energy facility in Massachusetts.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued nine serious safety citations against Tesla last month, with fines totaling $110,863. The citations stem from an injury to a Tesla employee working on a solar energy project at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts.
The employee suffered electrical shock and burn injuries Dec. 29 when he entered an electrical panel — energized at 13,800 volts — to take pictures of the equipment with his cellphone after construction was completed, according to an OSHA spokesman.
The employee was taken to a local hospital, where he was treated and released, a college spokesman said. Tesla owns and operates a 19-acre solar power system on the Hampshire College campus, providing electricity at a fixed rate to the private liberal arts school. The project was built by SolarCity, which Tesla acquired in 2016.
Federal regulators found that Tesla failed to provide workers with adequate training or protective gear. Employees did training courses online, but Tesla didn’t have a proficiency requirement to make sure they were using equipment properly, one citation stated. Workers couldn’t explain the correct distances to stay away from energized equipment, another citation said.
Four employees working on the solar installation, which has equipment energized at up to 13,800 volts, had been given gloves with a maximum voltage rating of 1,000, regulators found. And Tesla didn’t conduct required inspections of its safety procedures, a citation said.
A statement provided by Tesla said the citations are not appropriate and the company will appeal.
“Nothing is more important to us than the safety and well-being of those who work at Tesla every day,” the statement said. “After this accident happened, we did a thorough investigation and learned that the employee was performing work on a piece of equipment that he was not authorized or tasked to work on. He was treated immediately, has since recovered from his injury and has been back working at Tesla for the last few months.”
“It’s worth noting,” the statement said, “that we’ve never had another incident like this in the more than 250,000 service appointments at SolarCity and Tesla Energy.”
Tesla has had other electrical injuries at its car manufacturing plant in Fremont, California, however.
On June 5, a contractor suffered second- and third-degree burns to his face, chest, arms and hands from an electrical explosion called an arc flash. It threw him back 15 to 20 feet and set his clothes on fire, according to records from the state’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health. The electrician trainee was not qualified to be working on the equipment without supervision and didn’t have adequate protective gear, investigators found.
The company he worked for, Mark III Construction, was fined $52,800.
Tesla wasn’t cited in that case. But it was cited for an arc flash that occurred in 2014 at the Fremont factory, when an employee was cleaning inside an energized high-voltage electrical panel. The employee was burned on his arms, shoulder, back and face and lost consciousness when he was thrown to the ground. In that case, a $70,000 fine later was reduced to $40,400.
A Reveal investigation last month found systemic safety problems at Tesla’s Fremont factory. Former Tesla health and safety officials told Reveal that the company prioritized production over safety and failed to adequately train employees. Reveal also found the company undercounted injuries, making its safety record appear better than it actually is.
California’s workplace safety agency opened two investigations at the plant last month — one the day after Reveal’s investigation published and another after a contractor was struck by a piece of equipment and suffered a broken jaw April 9. California safety officials have cited Tesla for more than 40 violations since 2013.
The Massachusetts fine is the biggest safety-related fine for Tesla yet.
The $110,000 fine is higher than any levied against SolarCity before the Tesla acquisition and larger than any against competitors Sunrun, SunPower and Trinity Solar, according to a review of OSHA records by Reveal.
Another competitor, Vivint Solar, received a $136,708 fine in November. OSHA also fined Vivint Solar $126,749 in February 2017, but it was reduced to $50,000.
Tesla is allowed to dispute the citations and potentially negotiate a lower fine. An informal conference between Tesla and federal regulators is scheduled for May 10.
The incident won’t disrupt Tesla’s 20-year contract with Hampshire College, said spokesman John Courtmanche.
“We have a very good relationship with Tesla,” Courtmanche said. “I think we see it as an accident.”
Will Evans can be reached at wevans@revealnews.org. Follow him on Twitter: @willCIR.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.