A minor traffic fine in California can escalate quickly to hundreds of dollars. For low-income drivers, that can mean license suspensions and even jail time for failing to pay or driving without a valid license, a practice the U.S. Department of Justice has warned states against.
The California Legislature enacted a temporary amnesty program in October 2015, to help low-income drivers reduce their fines and get their licenses reinstated. During the first 15 months that the program was in place, it helped at least 205,000 Californians resolve their delinquent accounts. About 192,000 people had their licenses reinstated during that time.
That program expired this week. But proposed legislation would provide longer-term relief.
“The amnesty program grew out of recognition by the Legislature that license suspensions for failure to pay were hurting California families,” said Elisa Della-Piana, the legal director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, which is based in San Francisco. “It helped a certain number of people, but it only reduced debt for people who had tickets due before January 2013, and it didn’t stop new suspensions.”
When the amnesty program started in 2015, about 612,000 California drivers had a suspended license because of failure to appear or failure to pay, according to the Department of Motor Vehicles. During the life of the amnesty program that number dropped to about 488,000 drivers.
State Sen. Robert Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, who helped implement the amnesty program, introduced a measure in January that would prohibit courts from automatically suspending a driver’s license for failure to pay and it would force judges to consider a person’s ability to pay before assessing fines and fees.
The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and other advocacy groups support the bill as a way to help those still struggling with snowballing fines and fees and resulting license suspensions.
“It’s in everyone’s best interest to give Californians who are struggling to make ends meet a chance to keep their driver’s licenses, keep their jobs and pay off traffic ticket fines,” Hertzberg said in a press release announcing the bill. “We have to quit punishing people simply for being poor, and unfortunately, that’s what our justice system often does with high fines and fees for minor traffic offenses.”
California joins a handful of other states that are considering revamping their policies around driver’s license suspension. Under the Obama Administration, the Justice Department warned states that some of those policies violate the 14th amendment.
In March 2016, the Justice Department sent a letter to state and local courts about “increased attention on the illegal enforcement of fines and fees in certain jurisdictions around the country.” The letter also warned that that automatic suspension of driving privileges without due process was unconstitutional. Before suspending a driver’s license for failure to pay, courts must offer the driver an opportunity to prove that they are unable to pay, and not simply unwilling.
In the letter, DOJ encouraged states to implement reforms to “avoid suspending driver’s licenses as a debt collection tool, reserving suspension for cases in which it would increase public safety.”
Harriet Rowan can be reached at hrowan@revealnews.org. Follow her on Twitter: @hattierowan.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.