Investigators in New Hampshire are promising that new information will soon be available in one of the nation’s strangest so-called Jane Doe cases. Hunters first found the remains of a woman and a girl stuffed in a barrel in Allenstown, New Hampshire, 30 years ago. It took another 15 years for authorities to discover that there was another barrel just 100 yards away containing the remains of two more young girls.
None of the four have ever been identified.
Now the New Hampshire State Police is working with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the FBI to use new technology called isotope analysis that at least may help determine the region in which the victims lived. Authorities determined at the time that at least two of the victims were beaten to death, but it’s never been clear whether the four were biologically related to one another.
According to a Boston Globe story this week, investigators have scoured missing-persons reports, reviewed school records for children reported absent and interviewed nearby residents, but the trail has gone cold. A retired state police sergeant named John Cody who once worked the case said he did not blame police for taking so long to find the second barrel “because it was a football field away from where the first one was found and wouldn’t have been considered part of the initial crime scene,” according to the Globe.
But CNN described the circumstances of the investigation differently in a 2013 story about the Jane Does. According to the network, even though New Hampshire has an exceptionally low number of annual homicides, a man was coincidentally murdered in Hookset, New Hampshire, in an unrelated incident shortly after the first barrel was discovered, “and that murder became the priority of the police force,” i.e. state troopers. That killing was eventually solved 10 years ago.
According to CNN, “policy called for troopers to look into a cold case if they were not working on a current homicide,” so a trip from an investigator to the scene of the first barrel finally led to the second being discovered in 2000. A sergeant acknowledged to CNN “that many may question why it took 15 years to find a second barrel 100 yards from the other.” However, reported CNN, the sergeant “cited resources needed for the Hookset murder, the number of people in the major crime unit and the fact that autumn leaves covered much of the property.”
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.