It took a night for the reality to sink in – that in a sweeping chain of events, the Dakota Access Pipeline had been approved for completion. But for the foot soldiers behind the protests, the battle isn’t over.
“We’re not done yet,” said Joye Braun, the Cheyenne River Sioux woman who was the first to erect a teepee at the Sacred Stone camp in April.
What’s hardest for Braun is accepting the fact that drilling already has begun. Her yurt is set up directly across the Missouri River from the pipeline drill pad.
“I could literally feel the vibrations in the ground,” she said.
A spokesman for Energy Transfer Partners, the operator of the pipeline, confirmed that work had indeed resumed.
The $3.8 billion oil pipeline is 2 miles from reaching the Missouri River and its reservoir, Lake Oahe – the primary drinking water source of the Standing Rock Sioux and and thousands of others downstream, many of them Native Americans.
The original route of the pipeline veered farther north across the river, near municipal water wells in Bismarck, North Dakota. But concerns about contamination that arose early in the planning process rerouted the pipeline about half a mile from the Standing Rock reservation’s boundary, stirring up accusations of environmental racism.
Braun, an organizer with the Indigenous Environmental Network, has been a strong voice throughout the protest. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ granting of the easement needed to move ahead felt like a personal defeat.
“It’s heartbreaking,” she said, lifting up her glasses to stop tears from streaming down her face.
At the protest’s peak in early December, as many as 14,000 people gathered at the network of encampments sprawled across the borders of the reservation. The movement became a historic example of unity for indigenous people, as well as for individuals of all backgrounds, motivated by many different causes.
That momentum began to dwindle after an additional environmental review delayed construction and winter storms hit. Today, 500 or fewer people remain camped out on federal lands that the Corps of Engineers has ordered closed by Feb. 22. The stated concern of the agency, the tribe and state leaders is the danger of spring flooding.
The tribe has turned its attention to other targets, filing a preliminary injunction Thursday calling for a halt to construction and promoting its Native Nations March on Washington on March 10.
Still, some protesters resolve to stay put.
“I received a calling from the Earth Mother to those lands,” said Tiffanie Pieper, 31, an environmentalist from San Diego who arrived in December. “I mean, no disrespect to the tribe, but I’m not going anywhere.”
Tania Aubid declared a hunger strike Jan. 31 and has started to feel the effects of malnutrition.
“A few days ago, I started feeling a tingling in my arms,” said Aubid, from the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe in Minnesota.
This is her first hunger strike, but the 48-year-old is a seasoned activist who has protested numerous pipelines in the past. She intends to maintain her liquid-only regimen. She says she’s willing to die for this cause.
“Because when that pipeline breaks, it’s just going to decimate whatever’s in that river,” she said. “And it’s not if it’s going to break, it’s … when.”
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.