California’s workplace safety agency opened an investigation of Tesla Inc. on Tuesday, the day after Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting published an investigation of safety problems and unreported injuries at the carmaker’s Fremont factory.
Reveal found that Tesla did not count all of its work injuries as required by law, making its safety record look better than it actually is. Tesla maintains it records injuries accurately.
“Cal/OSHA takes seriously reports of workplace hazards and allegations of employers’ underreporting recordable work-related injuries and illnesses,” said Erika Monterroza, spokeswoman for the state Department of Industrial Relations, which includes the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, known as Cal/OSHA.
Monterroza said “that statement is not made lightly,” but she could not disclose details of the investigation or what triggered it. She said it was not related to a specific industrial accident.
More from Insult to Injury
Generally, she said, investigators look at multiple issues, including whether an employer is recording injuries and “things which may have been brought to the attention of the division.”
“They will look at all aspects to determine if the employer is following workplace safety and health regulations,” she said.
Tesla, in a statement, said that it cares deeply about its employees, that the claims prompting the investigation are baseless and that it will cooperate with regulators. It said Cal/OSHA did an investigation regarding Tesla’s injury records last year without finding any violations.
“In fact,” the statement said, “unlike other automakers who in the past have been cited by OSHA for record-keeping violations, we have never in the entire history of our company received a violation for inaccurate or incomplete injury record-keeping.”
Cal/OSHA has cited Tesla for more than 40 health and safety violations since 2013. This year, the agency cited the company for failing to provide employees with effective information and training on chemical hazards in their work areas, as well as failing to “effectively assess the workplace” for chemical hazards.
Tesla is appealing, but Laurie Shelby, the company’s vice president for environment, health and safety, said in a March interview with Reveal that Cal/OSHA raised an important issue about communicating effectively with employees.
“When Cal/OSHA comes in – granted, I would prefer them not to come in – but when they come in … they give us good information,” Shelby said. “We’re like a little city here and trying to make sure that our associates understand all the work that’s being done, and that that information funnels down is very important. … That’s a key point that Cal/OSHA’s made, and they’re spot on.”
Tesla responded to Reveal’s story Monday with a blog post titled, “A Not So Revealing Story.” It said Reveal reporters “have spent several months searching for old, misrepresentative and outright inaccurate information about safety at Tesla’s Fremont factory.”
The post included “a truth table that debunks more of their false claims,” claimed that employees felt harassed by inquiries from reporters and faulted Reveal for interviewing a representative of a worker advocacy organization.
Even before the story published, Tesla called the reporting “an ideologically motivated attack by an extremist organization working directly with union supporters to create a calculated disinformation campaign against Tesla.”
That prompted Jalopnik, the car-themed news site, to write, “Tesla’s War With The Media Is Just Unhinged At This Point.” Tesla has attacked the news media before, including The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian, Jalopnik noted, but “the company’s bizarre fight with the media reached new heights” with the response to Reveal.
Slate, meanwhile, wrote, “The tone the company is taking now borders on hysterical, and it appeals to people’s reflexive mistrust of the media in a way that feels awfully familiar in the Trump era.”
Fast Company noted that “the Elon Musk-founded car company – borrowing a PR tactic from President Trump – is claiming that a venerated journalism nonprofit is fake news. Reveal, however, has the receipts. It cites multiple on-site injuries that should have been recorded by Tesla.”
Will Evans can be reached at wevans@revealnews.org, and Alyssa Jeong Perry can be reached at alyssaperry@kqed.org. Follow them on Twitter: @willCIR and @alyssajperry.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.