A state lawmaker wants California to smack its biggest water users with hefty fines and bad publicity.
In a bill introduced last week, State Sen. Jerry Hill, a Democrat from the San Francisco peninsula, seeks to crack down on residential customers who are pumping huge amounts of water despite the state’s lingering drought.
While most Californians cut their use during the state’s three-year water emergency, hundreds of customers in pricey neighborhoods continued to use millions of gallons per year apiece, as Reveal reported in October.
One exceptional user – dubbed “The Wet Prince of Bel Air,” because he lives in that wealthy Los Angeles enclave – pumped an astonishing 11.8 million gallons in a year, enough for 90 families, state records show.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power refused to identify this mega-user or any of the 99 other million-gallon residential customers, citing privacy concerns.
Hill’s measure would require urban water agencies to set an “excessive use” level for residential customers and fine them $500 per 100 cubic feet of water they pump over that.
Then it would require agencies to make public the names of the mega-users who are paying the fines.
The findings undergirding Hill’s measure track closely with Reveal’s investigation.
“The ‘Wet Prince of Bel Air’ story really piqued your interest,” Hill said in a phone interview. “And for me as a legislator, I started thinking, what can we do to correct that?”
Today, Californians can be fined hundreds of dollars for such offenses as washing down a sidewalk or watering the lawn on the wrong day of the week. But in most cities, there are no rules against using as much water as you can pay for, drought or no.
“It’s only fair that those who use excessive amounts of water should be fined,” Hill said. “The fine is one deterrent, and certainly, the public notification is a deterrent.”
For many years, utility bills were public information in California. As Reveal has reported, during a 1991 drought, news stories identifying water wasters by name caused a public outcry and led to important reforms. But in 1997, the state Legislature, acting to protect the privacy of wealthy technology executives in Silicon Valley, passed a law allowing water agencies to keep utility bills confidential.
Hill’s measure would require the agencies to identify water wasters by name when they face fines.
Last year, the East Bay Municipal Utility District in Oakland began imposing fines on customers for excessive water use and emailing press releases listing violators by name.
That prompted a flurry of news stories about the high water bills of wealthy East Bay residents, including Oakland Athletics baseball executive Billy Beane and former Safeway stores CEO Steven Burd.
Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated the amount of water use that would result in a fine under a proposed California Senate bill. Residential customers would be charged $500 per 100 cubic feet used over an excessive-use level.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.