A few weeks ago, before the last protest camps at Standing Rock were cleared, President Donald Trump said he hadn’t “received a single call from anyone” about the Dakota Access pipeline.
One reason that could’ve been the case? The White House comment line was blocked to incoming messages. So we created our own phone number and asked you to leave us a voicemail explaining what you think Trump should know about the pipeline.
Since we first opened up the phone line, we’ve received about 200 voicemails from people in nearly every state – and Canada. A vast majority oppose the pipeline, citing the kinds of reasons that inspired thousands of people to join the movement at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.
A few were outraged over Trump’s comments about not receiving calls:
Many expressed broader concerns about energy production and advocated shifts in policies away from oil and gas to renewable energy:
We received several responses from callers who identified themselves as Native American and expressed solidarity with the tribes affected by the pipeline development:
Several folks told us about actions they themselves had taken to protest the pipeline, including divesting their money from banks, such as Wells Fargo, which finance Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline. Last month, Seattle became the first city to end its relationship with Wells Fargo in protest of the pipeline.
At least two messages weren’t explicitly against the pipeline, but each came with their own caveat. Reached by phone, Teresa Pedreira said that she’d rather not have the pipeline go through, but if it was going to be constructed anyway, it should be built through one of the original routes proposed by Dakota Access that would have placed the pipeline just north of Bismarck, North Dakota. The plan was rejected for several reasons early in the planning process, including the pipeline’s threat to the municipal water supply.
These are just a sample of the voices we heard. Since the White House comment line now is up and running again, we gave them a call and told them that we had received nearly 200 messages opposing the pipeline. We also are sharing transcripts of the voicemails through the White House’s digital portal, and are creating a CD with all of the messages and mailing a copy to the White House.
We’ll let you know if we get any response.
In the meantime, we’re going to continue reporting on the issues that were at the heart of the Standing Rock fight. In a new initiative, Chasing Energy, we’re looking at other locations where issues of energy development, Native American and other land rights, and environmental protection converge.
You can help inform our coverage. Just text the word “pipeline” to 701-289-9353 and we’ll send you updates on our reporting and opportunities to weigh in.
And, of course, you can always call the White House yourself and share your thoughts directly: 202-456-1111.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish Our Content
Thanks for your interest in republishing a story from Reveal. As a nonprofit newsroom, we want to share our work with as many people as possible. You are free to embed our audio and video content and republish any written story for free under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license and will indemnify our content as long as you strictly follow these guidelines:
-
Do not change the story. Do not edit our material, except only to reflect changes in time and location. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
-
Please credit us early in the coverage. Our reporter(s) must be bylined. We prefer the following format: By Will Evans, Reveal.
-
If republishing our stories, please also include this language at the end of the story: “This story was produced by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.”
-
Include all links from the story, and please link to us at https://www.revealnews.org.
PHOTOS
-
You can republish Reveal photos only if you run them in or alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not change them.
-
If you want to run a photo apart from that story, please request specific permission to license by contacting Digital Engagement Producer Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org. Reveal often uses photos we purchase from Getty and The Associated Press; those are not available for republication.
DATA
-
If you want to republish Reveal graphics or data, please contact Data Editor Soo Oh, soh@revealnews.org.
IN GENERAL
-
We do not compensate anyone who republishes our work. You also cannot sell our material separately or syndicate it.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, please contact Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If you plan to republish our content, you must notify us republish@revealnews.org or email Sarah Mirk, smirk@revealnews.org.
-
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
-
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
If you have any other questions, please contact us at republish@revealnews.org.